Skip to content
The Quiet Ledger
hr 1005 · 119th Congress · House

Combating the Lies of Authoritarians in School Systems Act

passed_houseSign in to watch / set alerts
TQL analysis
C66
66 / 90 · methodology full_text_v3

The Combating the Lies of Authoritarians in School Systems Act prohibits U.S. public elementary and secondary schools from accepting funds or entering into contracts with the Chinese government or Communist Party. It mandates disclosure of foreign funding and contracts to the Secretary of Education. The bill aims to prevent foreign influence in U.S. schools and ensure transparency in foreign financial interactions.

Structural flags
No enforcement or oversight imposes duties but names no enforcement or oversight mechanism
Legislative structure
Cosponsors
5 current · 5 total
Actions
20
Roll calls
1
Criterion breakdown8 criteria · max 90
Advanced Full criterion breakdown

The letter, score, and explanation above are free. The point-by-point breakdown of all eight scored criteria — with each criterion's value and how it moved the grade — is a Quiet Ledger research capability.

Access options →
Recorded vote · House roll call 312 · 2025-12-03
242 Yea · 176 Nay · 0 Present · 14 Not voting — Passed
R
2110 (Yea–Nay)
D
30176 (Yea–Nay)
I
10 (Yea–Nay)
Revealed positions from the official roll call — factual, not an endorsement.
Actions (20)
DateTimeAction
2025-02-05Referred to the House Committee on Education and Workforce.
2025-02-05Introduced in House
2025-02-05Introduced in House
2025-02-12Ordered to be Reported in the Nature of a Substitute by the Yeas and Nays: 20 - 14.
2025-02-12Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held
2025-03-05Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 6.
2025-03-05Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Education and Workforce. H. Rept. 119-12.
2025-03-05Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Education and Workforce. H. Rept. 119-12.
2025-12-0120:46:34Rules Committee Resolution H. Res. 916 Reported to House. Rule provides for consideration of H.R. 4312, H.R. 1005, H.R. 1049, H.R. 1069, H.R. 2965 and H.R. 4305. The resolution provides for consideration of H.R. 4312, H.R. 1005, H.R. 1049, H.R. 1069, H.R. 2965, and H.R. 4305 under a closed rule with one hour of general debate and one motion to recommit on each bill.
2025-12-0312:13:47Considered under the provisions of rule H. Res. 916. (consideration: CR H5005-5007)
2025-12-0312:13:52Rule provides for consideration of H.R. 4312, H.R. 1005, H.R. 1049, H.R. 1069, H.R. 2965 and H.R. 4305. The resolution provides for consideration of H.R. 4312, H.R. 1005, H.R. 1049, H.R. 1069, H.R. 2965, and H.R. 4305 under a closed rule with one hour of general debate and one motion to recommit on each bill.
2025-12-0312:14:43DEBATE - The House proceeded with one hour of debate on H.R. 1005.
2025-12-0312:31:55The previous question was ordered pursuant to the rule.
2025-12-0312:32:30POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on H.R. 1005, the Chair put the question on passage of the bill and by voice vote announced the ayes had prevailed. Mr. Scott (VA) demanded the yeas and nays and the Chair postponed further proceedings until a time to be announced.
2025-12-0316:47:58Considered as unfinished business. (consideration: CR H5012-5013)
2025-12-0317:03:31On passage Passed by the Yeas and Nays: 242 - 176 (Roll no. 312). (text of amendment in the nature of a substitute: CR H5005-5006)
2025-12-0317:03:31Passed/agreed to in House: On passage Passed by the Yeas and Nays: 242 - 176 (Roll no. 312). (text of amendment in the nature of a substitute: CR H5005-5006)
2025-12-0317:03:34Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
2025-12-0317:03:35The title of the measure was amended. Agreed to without objection.
2025-12-04Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Provenance
Methodology
full_text_v3
Calculated
2026-09-18 16:56:05.077+00
Source version
2025-12-04
Assessments
How the methodology works →

The Quiet Ledger grades legislation on its content. A bill grade is analysis of the bill — not a grade of its sponsor or of any member who voted on it.