Skip to content
The Quiet Ledger
FEC candidate · H8GA06286

HANDEL, KAREN CHRISTINE

House · GA-06 · REPLinked to member H001078 → (deterministic · office+state+district+exact-normalized-name (unique))Sign in to watch / set alerts
Reported financial totals by cyclesource: FEC candidate summary
CycleReceiptsDisbursementsIndividual contributionsCash on hand (end)DebtsCoverage through
2022$6,356$47,357$30$0$02021-04-01
2020$3,109,436$3,156,124$2,504,244$41,001$02020-12-31
2018$8,772,987$8,685,297$6,884,183$87,689$02018-12-31
Totals are the FEC's reconciled candidate summary for each two-year cycle — not a sum of itemized rows. A cycle is the election period, distinct from a congressional term.
Receipts by cycle (factual)
2018$8,772,987
2020$3,109,436
2022$6,356
FEC reconciled receipts per cycle. A factual time series — not a score, ranking, or partisan measure.
Authorized & associated committees3
CommitteeDesignation (as reported)TypeParty
FRIENDS OF HANDELAuthorized committeeHREP
HANDEL FOR GA-06Authorized committeeHREP
HANDEL FOR CONGRESS, INC.Principal campaign committeeHREP
Committee associations are the FEC's own candidate-committee linkage. A committee referencing a candidate is not necessarily controlled by the candidate.
Independent expendituresreported · not contributions to the candidate
SpenderPosition (as reported)AmountDate
PLANNED PARENTHOOD VOTESOppose$92021-05-19
NEA ADVOCACY FUNDSupport$32,7732020-12-09
NEA ADVOCACY FUNDOppose$31,4322020-12-09
NEA ADVOCACY FUNDOppose$32,7732020-12-09
NEA ADVOCACY FUNDSupport$32,7732020-12-09
NEA ADVOCACY FUNDOppose$32,7732020-12-09
NEA ADVOCACY FUNDOppose$31,4322020-12-09
PLANNED PARENTHOOD VOTESOppose$472020-11-20
PLANNED PARENTHOOD VOTESOppose$9482020-11-18
NEA ADVOCACY FUNDOppose$32,5132020-11-09
NEA ADVOCACY FUNDOppose$32,5132020-11-09
NATIONAL RIGHT TO LIFE VICTORY FUNDSupport$342020-11-02
HOUSE MAJORITY PACOppose$136,2572020-10-27
HOUSE MAJORITY PACOppose$99,9512020-10-27
HOUSE MAJORITY PACOppose$136,2572020-10-27
HOUSE MAJORITY PACOppose$99,9512020-10-27
HOUSE MAJORITY PACOppose$99,9512020-10-23
HOUSE MAJORITY PACOppose$136,2572020-10-23
NEA ADVOCACY FUNDOppose$31,4322020-10-22
HOUSE MAJORITY PACOppose$449,1372020-10-20
HOUSE MAJORITY PACOppose$99,9512020-10-20
NATIONAL RIFLE ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA POLITICAL VICTORY FUNDSupport$2,4972020-10-19
HOUSE MAJORITY PACOppose$99,9512020-10-16
HOUSE MAJORITY PACOppose$2,0002020-10-16
NEA ADVOCACY FUNDOppose$32,7732020-10-16
NEA ADVOCACY FUNDSupport$32,7732020-10-16
HUMANE SOCIETY LEGISLATIVE FUNDOppose$9,3332020-10-16
HUMANE SOCIETY LEGISLATIVE FUNDOppose$492020-10-16
HUMANE SOCIETY LEGISLATIVE FUNDOppose$9,3332020-10-16
HUMANE SOCIETY LEGISLATIVE FUNDOppose$492020-10-16
HOUSE MAJORITY PACOppose$11,7442020-10-15
HOUSE MAJORITY PACOppose$449,1372020-10-15
HOUSE MAJORITY PACOppose$2,0002020-10-13
HOUSE MAJORITY PACOppose$11,7442020-10-13
HOUSE MAJORITY PACOppose$99,9512020-10-13
HOUSE MAJORITY PACOppose$447,0982020-10-13
HOUSE MAJORITY PACOppose$11,7442020-10-13
HOUSE MAJORITY PACOppose$99,9512020-10-13
HOUSE MAJORITY PACOppose$2,0002020-10-13
EVERYTOWN FOR GUN SAFETY VICTORY FUND (EVERYTOWN VICTORY FUND)Oppose$523,3622020-10-13
EVERYTOWN FOR GUN SAFETY VICTORY FUND (EVERYTOWN VICTORY FUND)Oppose$4,5932020-10-13
NEA ADVOCACY FUNDOppose$32,7732020-10-13
EVERYTOWN FOR GUN SAFETY VICTORY FUND (EVERYTOWN VICTORY FUND)Oppose$4,5932020-10-13
NATIONAL RIGHT TO LIFE VICTORY FUNDSupport$5392020-10-12
NATIONAL RIFLE ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA POLITICAL VICTORY FUNDSupport$02020-10-12
NATIONAL RIGHT TO LIFE VICTORY FUNDSupport$5392020-10-12
NEA ADVOCACY FUNDOppose$32,5132020-10-09
CHINESE AMERICAN REPUBLICANS INCSupport$3002020-10-09
CHINESE AMERICAN REPUBLICANS INCSupport$2672020-10-09
HOUSE MAJORITY PACOppose$447,0982020-10-08
An independent expenditure is spending by a committee that is not coordinated with the candidate; the support/oppose position is reported by the spender. It is not a contribution to the candidate and does not imply candidate involvement.

All figures are as reported to the FEC. This page presents documented campaign-finance facts; it assigns no score, ranking, or influence judgement to the candidate or the linked member.