Skip to content
The Quiet Ledger
hres 282 · 119th Congress · House

Providing for consideration of the joint resolution (S.J. Res. 18) disapproving the rule submitted by the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection relating to "Overdraft Lending: Very Large Financial Institutions''; providing for consideration of the joint resolution (S.J. Res. 28) disapproving the rule submitted by the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection relating to ''Defining Larger Participants of a Market for General-Use Digital Consumer Payment Applications''; providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 1526) to amend title 28, United States Code, to limit the authority of district courts to provide injunctive relief, and for other purposes; providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 22) to amend the National Voter Registration Act of 1993 to require proof of United States citizenship to register an individual to vote in elections for Federal office, and for other purposes; and for other purposes.

failedSign in to watch / set alerts
TQL analysis
D54
54 / 90 · methodology full_text_v3

The resolution provides for the consideration of several joint resolutions and bills, including those disapproving rules by the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection and amending the National Voter Registration Act. It outlines procedural rules for debate and motions but does not directly address substantive policy changes.

Structural flags
No enforcement or oversight imposes duties but names no enforcement or oversight mechanism
Legislative structure
Cosponsors
0 current · 0 total
Actions
10
Roll calls
2
Criterion breakdown8 criteria · max 90
Advanced Full criterion breakdown

The letter, score, and explanation above are free. The point-by-point breakdown of all eight scored criteria — with each criterion's value and how it moved the grade — is a Quiet Ledger research capability.

Access options →
Recorded vote · House roll call 87 · 2025-04-01
206 Yea · 222 Nay · 0 Present · 3 Not voting — Failed
R
2068 (Yea–Nay)
D
0213 (Yea–Nay)
I
01 (Yea–Nay)
Revealed positions from the official roll call — factual, not an endorsement.
Actions (10)
DateTimeAction
2025-04-01Placed on the House Calendar, Calendar No. 14.
2025-04-01The House Committee on Rules reported an original measure, H. Rept. 119-49, by Mr. Griffith.
2025-04-01The House Committee on Rules reported an original measure, H. Rept. 119-49, by Mr. Griffith.
2025-04-0110:03:16The resolution provides for consideration of H.R. 22, H.R. 1526, S.J. Res. 18, and S.J. Res. 28 under a closed rule. The resolution provides for one hour of debate on each measure and one motion to recommit on H.R. 22 and H.R. 1526, and one motion to commit on S.J. Res. 18 and S.J. Res. 28. The resolution also provides that H. Res. 23 and H. Res. 164 are laid on the table.
2025-04-0112:19:58Considered as privileged matter. (consideration: CR H1389; text: CR H1389-1390)
2025-04-0112:24:36DEBATE - The House proceeded with one hour of debate on H. Res. 282.
2025-04-0113:58:22On ordering the previous question Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: 215 - 213 (Roll no. 86). (consideration: CR H1397-1398)
2025-04-0114:16:00On agreeing to the resolution Failed by recorded vote: 206 - 222 (Roll no. 87).
2025-04-0114:16:00Failed of passage/not agreed to in House On agreeing to the resolution Failed by recorded vote: 206 - 222 (Roll no. 87).
2025-04-0114:16:03Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
Provenance
Methodology
full_text_v3
Calculated
2026-09-18 16:58:29.891+00
Source version
2025-04-01
Assessments
How the methodology works →

The Quiet Ledger grades legislation on its content. A bill grade is analysis of the bill — not a grade of its sponsor or of any member who voted on it.