Skip to content
The Quiet Ledger
hres 189 · 119th Congress · House

Censuring Representative Al Green of Texas.

passed_houseSign in to watch / set alerts
TQL analysis
D62
62 / 90 · methodology full_text_v3

The resolution seeks to censure Representative Al Green for disrupting a joint session of Congress. It outlines the process for censure, including a public reading of the resolution by the Speaker.

Legislative structure
Cosponsors
34 current · 34 total
Actions
14
Roll calls
2
Criterion breakdown8 criteria · max 90
Advanced Full criterion breakdown

The letter, score, and explanation above are free. The point-by-point breakdown of all eight scored criteria — with each criterion's value and how it moved the grade — is a Quiet Ledger research capability.

Access options →
Recorded vote · House roll call 62 · 2025-03-06
224 Yea · 198 Nay · 2 Present · 8 Not voting — Passed
R
2130 (Yea–Nay)
D
10198 (Yea–Nay)
I
10 (Yea–Nay)
Revealed positions from the official roll call — factual, not an endorsement.
Actions (14)
DateTimeAction
2025-03-05Referred to the House Committee on Ethics.
2025-03-05Submitted in House
2025-03-0512:03:17NOTIFICATION OF INTENT TO OFFER RESOLUTION - Mr. Newhouse notified the House of his intent to offer a privileged resolution pursuant to clause 2(a)(1) of rule IX. The Chair announced that a determination will be made at the time designated for consideration of the resolution.
2025-03-0516:45:20QUESTION OF THE PRIVILEGES OF THE HOUSE - Mr. Newhouse rose to a question of the privileges of the House and offered the resolution. The Chair directed the Clerk to report the resolution. Upon examination of the resolution, the Chair determined that the resolution did constitute a question of the privileges of the House.
2025-03-0516:45:27Considered as privileged matter. (consideration: CR H998-1004)
2025-03-0516:47:06Ms. Clark (MA) moved to table the measure.
2025-03-0516:54:59On motion to table Failed by the Yeas and Nays: 209 - 211, 1 Present (Roll no. 60).
2025-03-0517:02:47DEBATE - The House proceeded with one hour of debate on H. Res. 189.
2025-03-0517:57:22The previous question was ordered without objection.
2025-03-0517:57:30POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on H. Res. 189, the Chair put the question on agreeing to the resolution and by voice vote announced that the ayes had prevailed. Mr. McGovern demanded the yeas and nays and the Chair postponed further proceedings until a time to be announced.
2025-03-0610:22:02Considered as unfinished business. (consideration: CR H1019-1020)
2025-03-0610:30:43On agreeing to the resolution Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: 224 - 198, 2 Present (Roll no. 62). (text: 03/05/2025 CR H998)
2025-03-0610:30:43Passed/agreed to in House: On agreeing to the resolution Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: 224 - 198, 2 Present (Roll no. 62). (text: 03/05/2025 CR H998)
2025-03-0610:30:45Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
Provenance
Methodology
full_text_v3
Calculated
2026-09-18 16:58:51.745+00
Source version
2025-03-06
Assessments
How the methodology works →

The Quiet Ledger grades legislation on its content. A bill grade is analysis of the bill — not a grade of its sponsor or of any member who voted on it.