Skip to content
The Quiet Ledger
hres 1499 · 119th Congress · House

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 1501) to amend the FAST Act to include certain mineral production activities as a covered project, and for other purposes; providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 9436) to amend the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2023 to extend the time period for which certain regulations concerning the North Atlantic right whale are effective; providing for consideration of the resolution (H. Res. 1490) providing for the condemnation and denouncement of socialism in all its forms, and for other purposes; providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 4795) to amend the Higher Education Act of 1965 to prohibit an institution that participates in a nonexpressive commercial boycott of Israel from being eligible for certain funds under that Act, to require an institution that participates in certain programs under that Act to certify that students are not unreasonably obstructed from participating in academic programs in Israel, and for other purposes; and relating to consideration of motions to suspend the rules.

passed_houseSign in to watch / set alerts
TQL analysis
D60
60 / 90 · methodology full_text_v3

The resolution provides for the consideration of several bills and resolutions, including amendments to the FAST Act, the Consolidated Appropriations Act, and the Higher Education Act, as well as a resolution condemning socialism. It outlines procedural rules for debate and amendments but does not directly address substantive policy issues or fiscal impacts.

Structural flags
No enforcement or oversight imposes duties but names no enforcement or oversight mechanism
Legislative structure
Cosponsors
0 current · 0 total
Actions
12
Roll calls
2
Criterion breakdown8 criteria · max 90
Advanced Full criterion breakdown

The letter, score, and explanation above are free. The point-by-point breakdown of all eight scored criteria — with each criterion's value and how it moved the grade — is a Quiet Ledger research capability.

Access options →
Recorded vote · House roll call 287 · 2026-09-01
212 Yea · 205 Nay · 0 Present · 15 Not voting — Passed
R
2110 (Yea–Nay)
D
0205 (Yea–Nay)
I
10 (Yea–Nay)
Revealed positions from the official roll call — factual, not an endorsement.
Actions (12)
DateTimeAction
2026-08-31Placed on the House Calendar, Calendar No. 88.
2026-08-31The House Committee on Rules reported an original measure, H. Rept. 119-785, by Ms. Foxx.
2026-08-31The House Committee on Rules reported an original measure, H. Rept. 119-785, by Ms. Foxx.
2026-08-3119:51:08The resolution provides for consideration of H.R. 1501, H.R. 9436, H.Res. 1490, and H.R. 4795 under a closed rule with one hour of general debate on each measure. The resolution provides for a motion to recommit on H.R. 1501, H.R. 9436, and H.R. 4795.
2026-09-0111:21:39Considered as privileged matter. (consideration: CR H5368-5377)
2026-09-0111:25:45DEBATE - The House proceeded with one hour of debate on H. Res. 1499.
2026-09-0112:20:33POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on H. Res. 1499, the Chair put the question on ordering the previous question and by voice vote, announced the ayes had prevailed. Mr. McGovern demanded the yeas and nays and the Chair postponed further proceedings until a time to be announced.
2026-09-0114:05:16Considered as unfinished business. (consideration: CR H5387-5389)
2026-09-0114:13:12On ordering the previous question Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: 212 - 205 (Roll no. 287).
2026-09-0114:21:14On agreeing to the resolution Agreed to by recorded vote: 210 - 208 (Roll no. 288). (text: CR H5368)
2026-09-0114:21:14Passed/agreed to in House: On agreeing to the resolution Agreed to by recorded vote: 210 - 208 (Roll no. 288). (text: CR H5368)
2026-09-0114:21:15Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
Provenance
Methodology
full_text_v3
Calculated
2026-09-18 16:51:44.532+00
Source version
2026-09-01
Assessments
How the methodology works →

The Quiet Ledger grades legislation on its content. A bill grade is analysis of the bill — not a grade of its sponsor or of any member who voted on it.