Skip to content
The Quiet Ledger
hjres 1 · 119th Congress · House

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to require that the Supreme Court of the United States be composed of nine justices.

failedSign in to watch / set alerts
TQL analysis
D62
62 / 90 · methodology full_text_v3

The proposed constitutional amendment seeks to fix the number of Supreme Court justices at nine. It is straightforward in its intent and scope, focusing solely on the composition of the Supreme Court without additional provisions or financial implications.

Structural flags
No enforcement or oversight imposes duties but names no enforcement or oversight mechanism
Legislative structure
Cosponsors
2 current · 2 total
Actions
15
Roll calls
1
Criterion breakdown8 criteria · max 90
Advanced Full criterion breakdown

The letter, score, and explanation above are free. The point-by-point breakdown of all eight scored criteria — with each criterion's value and how it moved the grade — is a Quiet Ledger research capability.

Access options →
Recorded vote · House roll call 293 · 2026-09-02
212 Yea · 206 Nay · 0 Present · 15 Not voting — Failed
R
2110 (Yea–Nay)
D
1205 (Yea–Nay)
I
01 (Yea–Nay)
Revealed positions from the official roll call — factual, not an endorsement.
Actions (15)
DateTimeAction
2025-01-03Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
2025-01-03Introduced in House
2025-01-03Introduced in House
2026-06-03Ordered to be Reported by the Yeas and Nays: 15 - 8.
2026-06-03Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held
2026-07-06Placed on the House Calendar, Calendar No. 84.
2026-07-06Reported by the Committee on Judiciary. H. Rept. 119-732.
2026-07-06Reported by the Committee on Judiciary. H. Rept. 119-732.
2026-09-0212:30:10Mr. Biggs (AZ) moved to suspend the rules and pass the resolution.
2026-09-0212:30:26Considered under suspension of the rules. (consideration: CR H5443-5451; text: CR H5443)
2026-09-0212:30:28DEBATE - The House proceeded with one hour of debate on H.J. Res. 1.
2026-09-0213:38:06At the conclusion of debate, the Yeas and Nays were demanded and ordered. Pursuant to the provisions of clause 8, rule XX, the Chair announced that further proceedings on the motion would be postponed.
2026-09-0216:00:37Considered as unfinished business. (consideration: CR H5459-5460)
2026-09-0216:35:33On motion to suspend the rules and pass Failed by the Yeas and Nays: (2/3 required): 212 - 206 (Roll no. 293).
2026-09-0216:35:33Failed of passage/not agreed to in House On motion to suspend the rules and pass Failed by the Yeas and Nays: (2/3 required): 212 - 206 (Roll no. 293).
Provenance
Methodology
full_text_v3
Calculated
2026-09-18 16:51:39.104+00
Source version
2026-09-02
Assessments
How the methodology works →

The Quiet Ledger grades legislation on its content. A bill grade is analysis of the bill — not a grade of its sponsor or of any member who voted on it.