Separation of Powers Restoration Act of 2023
TQL analysis
Not yet gradedThis bill has no published Quiet Ledger grade yet.
Legislative structure
Criterion breakdown8 criteria · max 90
No grade to break down.Recorded vote · House roll call 271 · 2023-06-15
220 Yea · 211 Nay · 0 Present · 2 Not voting — Passed
Actions (21)
| Date | Time | Action |
|---|---|---|
| 2023-01-11 | — | Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary. |
| 2023-01-11 | — | Introduced in House |
| 2023-01-11 | — | Introduced in House |
| 2023-06-01 | — | Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 60. |
| 2023-06-01 | — | Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Judiciary. H. Rept. 118-83. |
| 2023-06-01 | — | Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Judiciary. H. Rept. 118-83. |
| 2023-06-05 | 19:41:15 | Rules Committee Resolution H. Res. 463 Reported to House. Rule provides for consideration of H.R. 277, H.R. 288, H.R. 1615 and H.R. 1640. The resolution provides for consideration of H. R. 277 under a structured rule with one hour of general debate; H. R. 288 under a structured rule with one hour of general debate; H. R. 1615 under a structured rule with one hour of general debate; and H. R. 1640 under a structured rule with one hour of general debate. One motion to recommit on each measure. |
| 2023-06-12 | 21:24:00 | Rules Committee Resolution H. Res. 495 Reported to House. Rule provides for consideration of H.J. Res. 44, H.R. 277, H.R. 288, H.R. 1615 and H.R. 1640. The resolution provides for consideration of H. J. Res. 44 under a closed rule with one hour of general debate and H.R. 277, H.R. 288, H.R. 1615, and H.R. 1640 under structured rules with one hour of general debate. Motion to recommit allowed on each measure. The resolution also provides that the ordering of the yeas and nays on the question of reconsideration of the vote on adoption of H. Res. 463 be considered vacated and the motion to reconsider be laid on the table. |
| 2023-06-15 | 09:14:23 | Considered under the provisions of rule H. Res. 495. (consideration: CR H2938-2944; text: CR H2938-2939) |
| 2023-06-15 | 09:14:28 | Rule provides for consideration of H.J. Res. 44, H.R. 277, H.R. 288, H.R. 1615 and H.R. 1640. The resolution provides for consideration of H. J. Res. 44 under a closed rule with one hour of general debate and H.R. 277, H.R. 288, H.R. 1615, and H.R. 1640 under structured rules with one hour of general debate. Motion to recommit allowed on each measure. The resolution also provides that the ordering of the yeas and nays on the question of reconsideration of the vote on adoption of H. Res. 463 be considered vacated and the motion to reconsider be laid on the table. |
| 2023-06-15 | 09:16:11 | DEBATE - The House proceeded with one hour of debate on H.R. 288. |
| 2023-06-15 | 09:42:04 | DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 495, the House proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Hageman amendment No. 1. |
| 2023-06-15 | 09:52:23 | The previous question was ordered on the amendment and the bill pursuant to the rule. |
| 2023-06-15 | 09:53:54 | Ms. Dean (PA) moved to recommit to the Committee on the Judiciary. (text: CR H2944) |
| 2023-06-15 | 09:54:17 | The previous question on the motion to recommit was ordered pursuant to clause 2(b) of rule XIX. |
| 2023-06-15 | 09:54:40 | POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on H. R. 288, the Chair put the question on the motion to recommit and by voice vote, announced the noes had prevailed. Ms. Dean (PA) demanded the yeas and nays and the Chair postponed further proceedings until a time to be announced. |
| 2023-06-15 | 10:02:11 | Considered as unfinished business. (consideration: CR H2944-2945) |
| 2023-06-15 | 10:38:53 | On motion to recommit Failed by the Yeas and Nays: 210 - 220 (Roll no. 270). |
| 2023-06-15 | 10:49:12 | On passage Passed by the Yeas and Nays: 220 - 211 (Roll no. 271). |
| 2023-06-15 | 10:49:12 | Passed/agreed to in House: On passage Passed by the Yeas and Nays: 220 - 211 (Roll no. 271). |
| 2023-06-15 | 10:49:14 | Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection. |
The Quiet Ledger grades legislation on its content. A bill grade is analysis of the bill — not a grade of its sponsor or of any member who voted on it.